Doing a Background Check, Your Homework, and Getting the Blue Prints on General Contractors

December 11th, 2011
Doing your homework on contractors

How to prep for your general contractor

In my circle of friends …that I’ve run in the last ten to fifteen years, the standard order of things was: high school, college, girlfriend, house, wife, dogs (starter kids).  Aside of high school and college, the rest could get switched around here or there; but, that was the path we all seemed to have taken.

Logically, as our dogs had been a marked success, the next step would be… children (probably x2), but with another round of graduate school and the twilight of our young adult life dwindling down, we had decided that our little cottage craftsman home needed an update of the renovation style– the design kind rather than an addition to the family kind (either way it was going to be expensive).

Since my spouse was a seasoned HGTV watcher—home of the DIYN (Do it yourself Network), she had no problem deciding what was going to be done, in exactly what color, wood grain, and tile pattern.  She knew that she wanted the lighter maple cabinets in the kitchen to match the mosaic tile, to match the refinished floors, so on and so on.

Her obsession with home design didn’t end with HGTV DIY shows… she watched the programs about the failed contracts and city inspectors. The kind of programs that show how every day people are entrapped by “professional contracts” who cut corners or don’t finish jobs on time (or not at all).

Moreover, each episode exposes inspectors that casually glance over incorrect wiring/plumbing/etc and leave home owners with houses that will cost thousands to fix a few years down the road.

Think of the Holmes on Homes or Holmes Inspection shows (I know, they’re Canadian, but if it can happen in Canada, it can happen here).

At the time, our budget topped off at 30k, a third of the house’s worth at 120k—we knew it was going to be a commitment. I wanted to find someone who was (among other things)… reputable, cost effective, honest, and transparent.  She was more focused on the bottom line.  Together, we made a good team.

But we were like everyone else without much construction experience.  There wasn’t a test all General Contractors (GCs) take that can help the customer choose a good one and avoid the lemons.  Everyone needs work, will bid competitive prices, and knows their company is a small fish in a big pond.  But, to combat this, there are routes to take to check credibility.

There isn’t just one option that will guarantee a good experience with a GC, but combining two or more of the following options will aide in the chances you will have the correct expectations and know what you are getting into

  • An accurate background check will provide conclusive information about the owner.  Choosing a researching company to provide the most accurate information at the best price will save the customer much of the leg room.
  • The Better Business Bureau (BBB) is a good service to use to determine the legitimacy of the GC.  Among many things, the BBB provides consumers to research complaints and reviews about a business.  The best part… it’s free.
  • There are many free websites that offer similar services about local businesses.  Often times, simply Googling a business or contractor will provide a myriad of results.
  • Using websites like Angieslist.com claim that their membership dues (roughly 17 dollars for a year) cover the client from anonymous reviewers, use “certified” data collectors, and have a team that will intercede in the event something goes wrong with a home repair or health experience.  What that means may actually vary, but there is something to be said about reading reviews from non-anonymous reviewers.

When it comes to reviews, it’s tough to know what is good information and what is fluff that a company pays someone to write about them.  Angieslist may have qualified researchers and a team that legitimately helps in the event of a crisis; but, the peace of mind provided by unbiased reviewers (of course someone will likely be biased if he/she is writing a review, but at least he/she will be acting on their own genuine  experience) is what sells me on their site.

  • Check out the homes they have worked on in the past.  Ask for a list of the last ten homes the general contractor has worked on and check them out.  Ask the neighbors if the GC or his Sub-Contractors (Subs) were courteous and didn’t take up all the room on the street.  Don’t look like creepers, but check out the windows, the gutters, or the siding… whatever may be repeated.  Knock on the door of the home owner and ask about his/her experience with the general contractor and the hired subs.

Take those addresses and see how their market value has increased in the event they were sold.  That should give the researcher an idea about how much others have liked the GC’s work and if it increased the value of the home versus the average from the neighborhood, all good information to know for later in the homes life.

  • Take into account the amount of time the GC invested in the estimate. Was he/she on time? Was he/she they polite and take off shoes? Take into account the resources there were brought over to make decisions easier e.g. samples, color swabs, or catalogues.  It’s those little things that can make the difference when the bottle line is similar across the board.

Again, any one of these ideas won’t promise success.  When I had my home renovated, between the two of us, we probably checked off each item on this list.  But there weren’t surprises that took us off guard because of it and our contracting experience was a success.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Dating Background Check Promoter in Trouble

December 7th, 2011

Lying to a grand jury would not normally be called sleazy, something more like just plain stupid considering the consequences that in all likelihood will follow.  Most people would agree, however, that a married man messing with the dancers in a strip club is just plain sleazy.  Certainly, John Kenneth Arnold’s wife would agree.  After all, he was arrested on related charges on a Thursday morning.

Arnold is a co-founder of Intelius, an online provider of background checks.  Susan Kohler, chief marketing officer at Intelius, claimed that the company had just heard of the charges that morning and had no further comment other than that Arnold remained an employee at the company.  Co-founder Naveen Jain, commented from Los Angeles that he was shocked by the news, “It is extremely saddening to me because he is a really good guy.”  He says he also knew nothing of the charges prior to Thursday.

The charges stem from testimony Arnold gave before a grand jury in an investigation of Frank Colacurcio Sr, the owner of the strip club “Rick’s” where the incident took place.  Arnold is alleged to have lied when he denied engaging in certain lascivious acts with dancers at the club.  Considering that the investigation on Colacurcio included hidden cameras, ouch.

Ironically, last September Arnold was promoting an iPhone application from Intelius called “Date Check”.  This app includes a feature called “Sleaze Detector” that warns of any criminal history on a potential date.  In Arnold’s words, “Letting a stranger into your life is a huge risk, and in the age of Internet anonymity, a simple online search isn’t enough to tell you everything you need to know.”

Maybe now his wife is wishing that service had been around when she started dating him.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Criminal Background Check Helps Solve Cold Case

November 15th, 2011

In Rahway New Jersey, a criminal background check resulted in the arrest of a man wanted in a cold hit and run case.  Jeffrey Adams left the scene of an accident two years ago that sent four people to the hospital, and one of them, an elderly woman from Jersey City, to her grave.  Police say he was speeding on Grand Street in Jersey City at 2:45 AM when he struck the car in the oncoming lane.  Since that would have been early on a Sunday morning, it is easy to imagine that Adams was sloshed from a long Saturday evening.  Adams paid a visit to the same hospital shortly after the accident, from which police obtained his name and address.  Unfortunately for them, it was not a valid address (which quite likely resulted in the hospital getting stiffed as well).  The case eventually went cold as police were unable to track Adams down.

New Jersey state law requires a criminal background check for a gun permit, which is processed through the state police.  When Adams attempted to buy a rifle at New Jersey Firearms Guild, a gun shop, the police were alerted when his background check turned up the outstanding warrant.

The shop owner, Art Burtiss, didn’t notice anything unusual about this particular customer.  Adams made his down payment, and when his background check took longer than normal, left the shop since it was near closing time.  Burtiss said, “We didn’t notice anything unusual about him. It was taking a long time, so he left.”  When Adams’s gun permit was rejected, he came back in for a refund on his payment.  Burtiss stated, “We never know why someone’s background gets rejected, and the police did not tell us what was going on.”

When Adams arrived home on Tuesday, Essex County Sheriff’s department officers were waiting to apprehend him.  Hudson county prosecutor Edward DeFazio wasn’t certain whether Adams was even aware of the charges against him.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Substandard Criminal Background Checks are Expensive

November 9th, 2011

Skimping on a criminal records search will make you pay!

In a case on Monday in Naples FL, police arrested the building manager of a high-rise on theft charges.  In all, an estimated $11,090 worth of jewelry and electronics, along with prescription pain killers and “a large amount of cleaning supplies” were stolen.  Some of the stolen goods were recovered from the residence of the building manager.  Police are still investigating whether other thefts are also linked to this case.

The suspect, Robert Adamczewski, was hired 3 years ago.  The president of the condo association that hired Adamczewski claims he did a criminal records search that “came back showing no criminal history.”  He says, “We were shocked. We had put a lot of trust and faith in our manager. It was really unfortunate because a lot of people have trusted him. They like Bob.”  Right.  Obviously, liking someone is only part of the story when deciding to hire them.  The rest of this person’s character could have been revealed be a criminal background check from a reputable source.  By saving a few dollars, or saving his lazy ass a few calories by not properly researching his options, this president allowed a criminal to work in a position of trust.

It will be obvious to any intelligent person that in this instance, the lost trust toward the president of this condo association and any future building manager he hires will be far harder to replace than the over $12,000 worth of items that were stolen.  Had he conducted a criminal background check from a reputable online company, he could have saved himself this stain on his reputation.

Arizona Gun Laws and Lack of Criminal Background Checks Might Just be Crazy

April 30th, 2011

The right to defend oneself has generally been recognized since the beginning of recorded history.  In the United States, the right to self defense is considered to be constitutionally guaranteed even though not explicitly stated, as is the right to bear arms.  Because of the somewhat indefinite wording used in the Constitution, the debate on this issue, and the debate about what exactly the writers of the Constitution intended, has been raging ever since.

Last year a man openly carrying an AR-15 rifle at a protest outside a speech by President Obama brought Arizona’s loose gun laws to national attention. The past year or so, there has been a push by gun rights advocates to loosen up those laws a little more by reducing restrictions on where they can carry a firearm. Among their goals is to make Arizona the third state where it is legal to carry a concealed weapon without a permit. This would eliminate the requirement for criminal background checks and training classes for people wishing to carry a hidden weapon.

“That’s sheer insanity,” said Kristen Rand, legislative director for the Violence Policy Center. “If you remove the background check requirement, you’re literally writing a death sentence for law enforcement officers, family members, just people in the street.” A recent example we all know about was the shooting of Gabrielle Giffords by a person I consider to be a psychotic lunatic, one Jared Laughner. He clearly shouldn’t have been allowed to possess a gun, but whether he would have acquired one anyway, legal or not, is up for debate.

Regardless of legality or not, The Christian Science Monitor wrote, “Despite evidence that Arizona shooting suspect Jared Loughner is mentally unstable, he was never declared mentally unfit by a court, so his name did not appear in the federal background-check database used by gun sellers.”

The other side of the argument is that a criminal or anyone with nefarious motives will carry a gun anyway, and that restrictive gun laws simply tie the hands of law abiding citizens wishing to defend themselves.  In the words of Senator Russell Pearce, a Mesa Republican sponsoring the bill, “All we’re doing is handcuffing good people, restricting their constitutional, God-given right to carry and perhaps their ability to defend their families.”

Why this sort of argument justifies doing away with a criminal background check as a requirement to obtain a gun permit is anyone’s guess. Certain people simply should not have access to a gun, or anything like a gun, although as stated earlier, laws are unlikely to remedy that situation.