Posts Tagged ‘Background Check’

GOP to Look at Brady Gun Laws and Background Check Effectiveness

Thursday, January 27th, 2011

Staffers from the House Judiciary Committee will meet with Obama administration officials Thursday, January 27, to examine the effectiveness of federal laws designed to keep guns out of the hands of the mentally ill, according to a Republican aide with the panel.

The closed-door gathering will focus on whether a federal system of background checks is working to block gun sales to the mentally ill and others barred from owning firearms, the aide said Tuesday. The meeting comes three weeks after a shooting rampage in Arizona killed a federal judge, left a congresswoman seriously wounded and reignited the public debate over whether laws need to be tightened to prevent gun sales to those with mental problems.

Staff at Thursday’s meeting will consider whether the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) is effective. The system is an FBI-run database created by the 1993 Brady Handgun violence Prevention Act — a law named after former President Reagan’s press secretary, James Brady, who was seriously injured during the 1981 assassination attempt on Reagan.

Under current law, licensed gun dealers are required to screen potential buyers through NICS to ensure they don’t fit one of the categories barring them from purchasing firearms, including felons, illegal immigrants, spousal abusers and the mentally ill. The system is largely voluntary, however, as states are encouraged — but not required — to report information to NICS.

The holes in the screening system became evident in 2007, when Seung-Hui Cho, a 23-year-old Virginia Tech student, killed 32 students and teachers in one of the deadliest shooting rampages in the nation’s history. Although a judge had declared Cho mentally ill two years earlier, the state did not report its evaluation to NICS, allowing Cho to pass a background check by a licensed dealer.

Following the Virginia Tech tragedy, Congress unanimously passed a law designed to bolster the NICS system by providing states with financial incentives to report records of mental illness (and other red-flag cases) to the FBI. The NICS Improvement Amendments Act was supported by the NRA and signed by then-President George W. Bush in early 2008, but reporting by states remains voluntary.

Different state privacy laws, budget restraints and political considerations have hampered the effectiveness of the enhanced reporting. Indeed, through August of last year, 10 states had not reported any
cases of mental illness to NICS, while 28 states had submitted fewer than 100 records, according to Mayors Against Illegal Guns, an advocacy group.

On Monday, Mayors Against Illegal Guns — a group headed by New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Boston Mayor Thomas Menino — introduced a proposal to require states to report mental health records, drug-abuse histories, domestic violence cases and other red flags to NICS. The proposal would also require unlicensed gun dealers to perform NICS background checks — a step not mandated under current law.

“While I support the Second Amendment rights of responsible, law-abiding Americans, I also support tough, common-sense laws to keep guns out of the hands of felons, drug abusers, the mentally ill and other dangerous people,” Grant Woods, former Republican attorney general of Arizona, said in endorsing the Bloomberg proposal.

NICS funding is also an issue Judiciary will examine Thursday. Although the post-Virginia Tech law authorized $188 million for NICS in fiscal 2009, and another $375 million in fiscal 2010, Congress
appropriated only $10 million and $20 million, respectively — or 5.3 percent of each year’s authorization.

With Republicans controlling the House, even the most vocal gun-control advocates have been pessimistic about the chances of any gun reforms moving in the 112th Congress — even after the near-assassination of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.). Michael Steel, spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), deflected questions to the Judiciary Committee, which has jurisdiction over the gun-reform issue.

President Obama invoked Giffords’s spirit during Tuesday’s State of the Union address but made no mention of gun reform — a silence that irritated gun-control advocates on and off Capitol Hill. “I’m disappointed, but not surprised,” Rep. Jim Moran (D-Va.), a longtime gun-reform proponent, said after the speech. David Plouffe, a senior White House adviser, said Tuesday
that the disappointment is premature. “[Obama's] going to address this,” Plouffe told NBC’s Brian Williams.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Virginia Tech Victims Families ask Government to Fix Background Checks for Guns

Monday, January 24th, 2011

WASHINGTON — In the wake of the Tucson, Arizona shootings, in which a gunman killed six people and injured 13 others, family members of victims in the mass 2007 shooting at Virginia Tech are urging Congress to fix a gun background-check system that often allows people to buy firearms even after they have been convicted of crimes or judged mentally ill.

Jared Lee Loughner, the alleged shooter of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.) and others, fits the profile to be denied gun ownership under federal law. He has a documented history of drug abuse, including a 2007 arrest on drug charges. But like Virginia Tech shooter Seung-Hui Cho, Loughner was able to slip through the cracks and purchase a gun because of missing records in the background-check system that federally-licensed gun dealers consult before selling a weapon.

Congress has attempted to solve this problem before, but with unsatisfying results. In the months following the Virginia Tech shooting, lawmakers passed a bill meant to increase the number of records entered into the National Instant Criminal Background Check System. Lori Haas, whose daughter Emily survived being shot twice in the head at Virgina Tech, said the weekend’s events should renew focus on the need for Congress to implement stronger gun control. Cho, the Virginia Tech shooter, purchased a gun over the counter despite being found a danger to himself in court in 2005, which should have disqualified him from such a purchase.

“When mentally ill people get their hands on a gun, something is wrong with the system.”

Since 2007, Congress has provided only a small amount of the funds it promised states to improve documentation in the background-check system.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Benefits Of Reverse Search And Background Check Services Explained by PrivatePhoneAgent

Friday, January 21st, 2011

Press Release – BestBackgroundCheck.org has no affiliation and does not endorse the product advertised below.

Newly launched online look-up site, PrivatePhoneAgent, discussed yesterday how people could benefit from their services.

“We know we are a brand new type of service that the public may not be used to yet,” Colin, a company spokesman said. “We feel it is our obligation to let people know how we work, and why they might want to use us.”

PrivatePhoneAgent provides reverse look-ups and people look-ups for free, and offers background checks for a fee. During a reverse look-up, a person types in a phone number and is provided with the name and address of the person who called. Then they can buy the background check, which includes criminal records, marital records, civil count records, bankruptcies, judgments and sex offender registry status among other information. A people look-up works much the same way, except instead of typing in a number people enter a person’s name and are given their number and address. At that point they have the option of purchasing the same type of background report.

“The point of our site is to give people the information they need to make informed choices in their lives,” Colin said. “We want to empower our customers to seek out the most knowledge possible.”

The company said the main reason to use their site is to check on people who call up claiming to represent your bank, a non-profit group or some other company you do business with on a regular basis.

“Before now, you couldn’t be sure if the person who called you was who they claimed to be or represented the organization they claimed to represent. Unfortunately, there’s many scams out there so you want to make sure your not being taken advantage of,” Colin said. “Now, with just a few keystrokes you can feel protected”

The service can also be used to check up on who your children are dating, the company said.

“Imagine your daughter called from college and told you she had a new boyfriend,” Colin said. “Wouldn’t you want to be able to make sure she hasn’t started dating a criminal, a deadbeat or a sex offender? Now you can.”

Of course, the company said there are also benign reasons to use their service.

“It’s easy to lose track of old friends you want to get back in touch with,” Colin said. “Now all you have to do is type in their name, and you’ll have their phone number in a matter of seconds. That makes it easy to catch up with them.”

Technorati Tags: ,

Jared Loughner Was Kept off FBI Background Check List Due to Reno Era Policies

Thursday, January 20th, 2011

Put in place by then-Attorney General Janet Reno, the policy prohibited the military from reporting certain drug abusers to the FBI, which manages the national list of prohibited gun-buyers, federal officials said.

Loughner attempted to enlist in the Army in December 2008 but was rejected because he failed a drug-screening process, Army officials said. Within a year, Loughner bought a Harrington Richardson shotgun from Sportsman’s Warehouse in Tucson.

In November, he went back to the same store and purchased a Glock 19 – the one he is accused of using in the Jan. 8 rampage that killed six and wounded 13, including Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D).

Federal law since 1968 has prohibited gun sales to anyone who is an unlawful user of or addicted to a controlled substance. Licensed dealers have been required to check the backgrounds of gun-buyers since 1994. But the Reno policy told federal agencies not to report people who had voluntarily given drug tests for fear it would deter them from seeking treatment, federal officials said.

“We do get reports from the military,” said John A. Strong, the FBI section chief who oversees the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS). “Although if you are trying to get into the military and flunk the drug test, that’s a voluntary test and you are exempted. The [Justice Department] has decided to exempt voluntary drug tests. They did not want to have a chilling effect on those seeking treatment.”

Robyn Thiemann, deputy assistant attorney general in the Office of Legal Policy, said, “It was a policy determination that was made in the Reno administration.” She said she could not release the memo because it is an internal document.

The Reno policy remained in place despite a 2007 law designed to improve the NICS. That law ordered all federal agencies to forward to the FBI the names of those ineligible under federal law to buy a gun from a licensed dealer. The law states that the names are to be sent at least quarterly, “notwithstanding any other law.”

Despite the NICS Improvement Amendments Act, the Defense Department apparently did not change its policy. Drug test information is still not forwarded to the FBI to protect the privacy of the applicants, said Col. Thomas Collins, an Army spokesman.

“Currently, there is no statute that clearly stipulates what conditions or scenario would warrant a report about military applicants or recruits to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System,” said Defense Department spokeswoman Eileen Lainez.

If Loughner had been put on the prohibited list in 2008, he would have remained there for one year under the rules of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, which enforces federal gun law. It will never be known if he would have tried to buy a second gun after being denied the first.

Few drug abusers wind up on the NICS list as being ineligible to purchase a firearm because of that abuse or addiction. The current number of people who are listed in that database is 2,092, or less than 1 percent of the 6 million names, according to NICS data. Of those who tried to buy firearms between 1998 and 2008 but were prohibited, drug abusers made up about 8 percent, or 65,000, the data show.

Strong said that’s partly because many drug abusers are in the database as felons, who are also prohibited from buying firearms from licensed dealers. Strong added that Loughner’s 2007 arrest for possession of drug paraphernalia was not reported by the state to the NICS. The charge was dismissed after he entered a drug-diversion program.

Anyone can end up on the list if it can be determined that the person has abused drugs within a year, Strong said. For example, a current or former member of the armed forces can be added to the list if a soldier is disciplined, arrested, convicted at court-martial or discharged for drug abuse.

The Arizona case has prompted two New York politicians, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg (I) and Democratic Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D), to call for the military to report drug offenders to the FBI-run background check list. “We should fix this reporting loophole,” Schumer wrote Sunday to Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. Justice spokesman Matthew Miller said the department was reviewing Schumer’s letter.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Gun Background Checks Should be Enforced

Monday, January 17th, 2011

Don Heinzman Editorial – The senseless shooting in Arizona raises questions on who should be allowed to buy a semi-automatic pistol with a magazine capable of holding 33 rounds of ammunition.

Regulating how to prevent a mentally deranged person from buying a gun appears to be impossible.

Mental stability restrictions are written into federal and state gun-buying regulations, but they are difficult to enforce.

What is possible to enforce is the background check required on all those who buy guns.

In Minnesota, a person buying a gun must fill out a form with vital information used to make an FBI criminal background check on the buyer.  That background check is supposed to prevent buyers who have mental problems from purchasing the gun.  If the purchaser passes the background check they can buy the weapon.

There are, however, two instances in Minnesota where background checks are not required.  Buyers can purchase weapons at gun shows without the background check and private parties can sell guns to one another without checking on the buyer’s background.

The Citizens for a Safer Minnesota/Protect Minnesota will lobby the Minnesota Legislature this session to close those loopholes.  Most people would agree those exceptions should not be allowed.

Heather Martens, executive director of Citizens for a Safer Minnesota, is looking for a way that gun dealers could become aware of people trying to purchase guns who have been adjudicated mentally incompetent.  She suggests gun dealers could then alert other dealers when someone mentally incompetent tries to purchase a gun.

It is easy to buy the semi-automatic Glock 19 pistol in Minnesota, the kind Jared Lee Loughner used to gun down victims in Arizona.  One gun dealer say the Glock 19 pistol is a popular one purchased in the state.

From 1994 to 2004, that weapon and the magazine capable of holding 33 rounds most likely would have been banned under the Brady law.  That ban, however, expired in 2004 and was never reinstated.

Under that law, sales of certain semi-automatic assault weapons were banned and the number of rounds in a magazine was limited to 10.

It’s likely most Minnesotans would agree that such a high-capacity assault weapon should be banned from being purchased and the rounds again should be limited to 10.

One good outcome of the Arizona tragedy would be to devise a way to alert local gun dealers of mentally disturbed customers trying to buy a weapon and to bring back the federal ban on semi-automatic assault weapons capable of holding 33 bullets in the magazine.

Technorati Tags: , , ,