Posts Tagged ‘illinois criminal records’

Illinois School Decides Program is Worth More Than Criminal Background Checks

Monday, October 11th, 2010

background-check-deemed-not-necessary-in-illinois-school-districtNorth Clay Elementary and Junior High School in Louisville, Illinois is taking another approach to gaining the involvement of its parents. More fathers and grandfathers are taking part in the school and their children’s lives. They’re part of the school’s new WatchDOGS program, an initiative by the National Center for Fathering to get men involved in their children’s schools. North Clay’s entry into the program makes it one of more than 1,650 participating schools nationwide, but only the seventh in Illinois.

The program has quickly become a hit with students and volunteers alike, Top Dog and first-grade teacher Curtis Thompson said recently. Just a month ago, as school was kicking off, the program had only eight men in its ranks. By the end of September, that number had grown to 31. Local businesses also have thrown their support behind the program, donating just over $1,600 to the WatchDOGS.

But the fast growth of a new and unfamiliar program made at least one area resident uncomfortable enough to bring her concerns before the district’s school board, making for a rocky start for the month-old program as board members took up discussions on the district’s background check policy for volunteers.

According to its website, the WatchDOGS program was started by a concerned father in the wake of the 1998 Jonesboro, Ark., middle school shooting, in which two boys, aged 11 and 13, shot and killed four students and one teacher. That said, student safety is the program’s main emphasis, Thompson said. “We’re doing everything we can to help keep the kids safe,” he said. “It’s our No. 1 priority.”

But the program recently came under fire over safety when a local child care provider approached the district’s school board with concerns about how background checks were being conducted on the men involved in WatchDOGS.

Currently, the school district does not perform official background checks on WatchDOGS — or any other volunteers. Instead, the district cross-references names against public listings of sex offenders and consults with the Clay County Sheriff’s Office and may make contact with volunteers’ employers, if further investigation is deemed necessary by the unit office, Superintendent Monty Aldrich said.

Child care provider Shelly Allen told administrators and board members at the Sept. 23 meeting she was afraid that process might allow the wrong people to slip through the cracks without a comprehensive criminal background check. Allen was the only school district resident who showed up at the meeting to make her point, but she said she is not the only parent concerned. “Yes, I’m the only person here, but there’s a bunch of other people out there who are worried,” Allen said. “I am not against the program whatsoever. I am just against the way the backgrounds are conducted.”

State law only requires schools to do criminal background checks on employees, leaving districts open to determine their own policy for checking volunteers. That leeway has created discrepancies from district to district across the state. For example, Effingham Unit 40, as Allen pointed out to North Clay board members, requires background checks for participants in its popular mentoring program.

But WatchDOGS proponents say the two programs are too different to be compared. Unlike the Unit 40 program, the WatchDOGS are not assigned to a specific student but rather hop between classrooms to cover as many students as possible, so there is not the same one-on-one component that there is to the mentoring program. Moreover, Thompson told board members, WatchDOGS’ contact with students is always supervised by teachers.

And in a time of financial instability brought on by the state’s budget crisis, perhaps the district’s biggest argument against the formal background checks is the cost that comes with them. Background checks currently run the school $49 a piece, Aldrich said, a cost that, when multiplied by the number of men involved in the program, could become prohibitive. “If we pay $49 per person, we’ll have our answers, but we might not have a program,” he told the board.

In the end, board members told Allen they would take her concerns “under advisement,” but took no formal action on the issue. The week following the school board meeting saw no changes to the WatchDOGS’ operations, with eight volunteers showing up on campus to read and play with the preschool through fifth-grade students. Another nine were slated to come last week. Elementary and Junior High Principal Julie Healy said recently the program has created “a positive situation all the way around.”

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

Mayor In Illinois Makes Life Hell For 2nd Amendment Supporters…Requiring Unresaonable Restrictions

Wednesday, July 28th, 2010

Political corruption is synonymous with Illinois.

During the 1950s, Mayor Richard J. Daley’s political machine dictated every Illinois politician’s next move. It included the neighborhood alderman as well as a string of governors who spent time behind bars. Today, there is another arrogant ex-governor who will hopefully spend time behind bars.

Things haven’t changed much. Today, “junior,” or Mayor Richard J. Daley, is successfully manipulating a recent decision of our nation’s highest court. Daley is presently the Second Amendment’s most ruthless, obnoxious opponent. The Second Amendment guarantees our right as Americans to own and bear arms, and Chicago law forbids handgun ownership. While Daley surrounds himself with heavily armed, around- the- clock security, he belittles firearms ownership by his Chicago constituents.

Daley recently encountered someone who refused to cower to his demands. Otis McDonald, a black man and multiple crime victim, moved to Chicago forty years ago. Today this son of a Louisiana sharecropper is 76 years old. McDonald holds impressive credentials. An Army veteran, he became head of his local union as well as a maintenance engineer at the University of Chicago. All McDonald wanted was the ability to defend himself on the street as well as in his home.

*Otis McDonald decided to act. He sought out Illinois gun right activists, and eventually became the lead plaintiff in the case that became known as McDonald v. City of Chicago. The Chicago crime rate had risen steadily since the handgun ban was made law 28 years ago, and McDonald’s case would include not just Chicago, but state and local governments as well. To quote McDonald, “It’s impossible for Mayor Daley or any politician backing the gun ban to know what it’s like to live unarmed on a block where bad guys are packing guns and willing to shoot.”

In June 2010, our nation’s highest court ruled for McDonald and guaranteed a law-abiding individual’s right to have a handgun — even in the city of Chicago. Will this change lower the city’s crime rate? It should. In comparing Chicago’s murder rate to that of our fifty other largest cities, Chicago’s rate was falling before the 1983 handgun ban. After the ban, the trend reversed. From 2007 to 2008, the FBI’s latest figures, the U.S. murder rate decreased by 4.7 percent while Chicago’s increased by nearly 15 percent.

Mayor Daley is not accepting the high court’s decision. In order for Chicagoans to legally own a handgun by possessing a Chicago Firearms permit, they must jump through a series of unreasonable, if not impossible, hoops. Applicants must first be fingerprinted. Then they must pass a background check. Since the federal government already requires a background check for any gun purchase, this may or may not be acceptable as I don’t know where Daley is drawing the line.

Next comes the hundred dollar application fee plus fifteen dollars for every gun registered. Applicants must then, if they have survived so far, take and pass a four hour class plus one hour of training at a gun range. They must then submit affidavits signed by state-approved firearms instructors. So far, it is not known where these instructors can be found, or who approved them.

Daley’s arrogance in defying a Supreme Court ruling is ludicrous! I can reasonably predict what is going to happen. In defiance of Daley, Chicago residents will continue to purchase their handguns in an Illinois community outside Chicago as Chicago has no gun retailers. Like all of us, they will fill out the yellow federal firearms purchase form, pass the background check, and wait the mandatory waiting period. If they are ever arrested for not having a Chicago Firearms Permit, they have the Supreme Court ruling on their side. They can fight it and win.

I would like to comment on Chicago then and now. In 1961, when I pointed my Smith & Wesson into the faces of “would be” rapists and murderers who threatened to bust in my windshield with a crowbar, they backed off because their minds were clear. Their brains weren’t fried on drugs. In 1957, when a knife-wielding subway robber asked me for my money, he didn’t carve me up after I gave him my $1.57. His mind was clear. Today’s drugs have altered clear thinking to the point where rational acts are not a part of the equation. Otis McDonald knows all about this.

In supporting Otis McDonald, the National Rifle Association supported all of us. It is a good reason to join the NRA if you don’t belong. If you don’t know where to go, call me and I’ll personally sign you up. The NRA has been criticized recently for seeming overstepping its usual boundaries. A case in point are Supreme Court nominations. If our highest court isn’t composed of justices who support our Constitution, those things most important to us, including The Second Amendment, may be lost. It does relate, and the NRA needs to pay close attention.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Chicago Gun Ordinance May Be a Direct Violation of 2nd Amendment Rights

Monday, July 12th, 2010

CHICAGO – A new gun ordinance in Chicago that is being touted as the strictest of its kind in the entire United

The ordinance permits residents to have only one working gun at a time in their homes and prohibits them from stepping outside…even onto their porches or in their garages…with a handgun. You think this will make folks angry?

Following the lead of Washington, D.C., which enacted a strict ordinance after the Supreme Court struck down its gun ban two years ago, Chicago also requires prospective gun owners to take a class and receive firearms training.

Chicago’s ordinance also bans gun shops from setting up shop in the city and bars anyone convicted of a violent crime, domestic violence or two or more convictions for driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs from owning a handgun. Basically, you will be under the scrutiny of some pretty serious background check procedures.

However, Chicago is allowing for a 90-day grace period in which residents who owned handguns illegally during the ban can register them without penalty.

Chicago’s ordinance was widely criticized by gun rights advocates, who have said the city is simply trying to make it as difficult as it can for people to own guns and putting up unconstitutional roadblocks in their way. They promised lawsuits and last week, even before the ordinance went into effect, at least two lawsuits were filed challenging the constitutionality of the ordinance.

City officials have said they believe the lawsuit is constitutional and that the Supreme Court specifically ruled that local jurisdictions have the right to impose reasonable regulations and restrictions.

Personally, I see this type of legislation as a direct attack on my right to bear arms, and is just paving the way for increased control. Some time ago I wrote about gun legislation in Arizona that would allow guns in establishments that serve alcohol. While I also didn’t agree with that, I think that these types of legislation on opposite extremes of gun control help ensure there is indeed middle ground left.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Protect Your Child: Your Sitter May Have Multiple Criminal Records

Saturday, February 13th, 2010

It seems that no matter where you look, there are stories in the news of babysitters abusing their charges. Case in point, a quick search of the news from yesterday brought up two new instances, one in Chicago, Illinois and one in Houston, Texas.

In these two instances, details are sketchy because the cases have yet to be investigated. However, a common thread appears to be that the perpetrator becomes angry or frustrated with the child, and ends up injuring them. The case in Houston, Texas confirms this, where investigators allege that the babysitter Jordan Thomas Harris became angry with the 11-month old boy when he started crying, and injured him.

Details are even more incomplete in the story from Chicago, Illinois. In this case, the babysitter Abigail Cihak is accused of fracturing the skull of a nine month old baby girl.

Click below for the stories in the news.

Babysitter charged with battery of 9-month-old: cops
SUN-TIMES MEDIA WIRE
A Far South Side woman has been charged with fracturing the skull of a 9-month-old girl she was babysitting

HPD: Babysitter seriously injured crying child
KHOU
by khou.com staff HOUSTON—A babysitter is facing charges after police say he seriously injured an 11-month-old child. Houston police were called to the …

Concerned parents may be at a loss when it comes to determining who to let in contact with their children, especially when it comes to the question of whether their children will be safe while the parents are away. While a healthy dose of common sense goes a long way, conducting an online background check is a good starting point in vetting any potential babysitter. Just like with babysitters though, some online background check services will leave you feeling abused and without answers. The work of locating hassle-free and comprehensive service has been done and is available to you in a free report from bestbackgroundcheck.org.

If the online background check is satisfactory, parents can help make sure their children will be in good hands by interviewing potential babysitters. Questions about procedures in specific situations, such as if the child starts crying, will help weed out unqualified individuals. Such an interview will also give parents a feel for trustworthiness of the candidate that only personal contact can give them.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,